The IES method for daylight calculation is consistent with the Lumen method for uniform electric lighting calculation.  It treats the window as if it is a side luminaire, and uses “light loss factor” and coefficients of utilization” to arrive at the required illuminance value.  Required daylight information includes exterior horizontal and vertical illuminance.

The method has been developed from the same methodology described earlier, which uses numerical integration of equations (3.4.5), (3.4.11), (3.4.12) and (3.4.13).

Consistent with tabulation based methods, there are assumptions on room configuration, the work plane, and the sky luminance distribution.

The Lumen method adopts 5 sky luminance distribution models. 

3.5.1 Assumptions and Characteristics of the Method
The sky distribution models are given in Table 3.3.6

a)   The method applies to rectangular-shaped room with uniformly distributed windows.  If the room has irregular shape, prudent judgment must be used.
b)   The method does not accommodate direct sunlight.  The effects of shading devices can be accommodated through accounting for view factor of the window to the sky.
c)    Provisions are allowed for different glazing type and vertical and horizontal blinds.
d)   The following figure illustrates the configuration for the application of the method.


Figure3.5.1 Configuration of the room in the Lumen method.

  • The ceiling reflectance is assumed 70%.  The ceiling surface extends from the part of the wall above the window.
  • The wall reflectance is assumed 50%.  The wall surface extends from the window sill to the top of the window.
  • The floor reflectance is assumed 30%.  The floor surface extends from the floor to the window sill.
  • The workplane is 0.75 m. from the floor.  The window sill is at the workplane.

If the window sill height is within 0.30 m. (1 foot) from the workplane, no adjustment is necessary, if the window sill is below the workplane, say, extends down to the floor, then the light contribution from the part of the window below the sill is discounted.  But if it is required superposition method can be used to assess the contribution of the additional light contribution.  If the sill is too far above the workplane, then there is an unavoidable error in using the method.

The method gives illumination values for 5 points on the workplane, at 10, 30, 50, 70 and 90% of room depth, measured from the window.

3.5.2 Calculation Procedure
Let Ekv   and Ekh   be the illuminance values on an exterior vertical plane, and an exterior horizontal plane respectively.

Step 1  Determine the effective light transmittance through the window, Te

Let              Te    =   (T)(Vf  )(LLF   )

where:  Tw   = transmittivity of the window glazing, see sample values in table.

             Vf  = effective view factor of interior of window frame to the sky, accounting for shading devices, and blinds

            LLF  = light loss factor accounting mainly for loss in visibility and light to surrounding, see recommended values in table.

Step 2  Determine the exterior horizontal illuminance Ekh   and vertical illuminance Ekv   to be used for the calculation.

Step 3  Determine the coefficient of utilization: sky component CU, and the coefficient of utilization: ground component CUg   from tables.

For CUk  , the values are tabulated with the following parameters;

  • the ratio of Ekv  /(Ekh  /2)
  • Ww  (window width)/Hw  (window height)
  • (room depth)/Hw  (window height)

For CUg , the values are given for (D /H) and (W/Hw  ) ratios.

Step 4  Calculate the interior illuminance at the workplane, at each of the 5 points, by the relationship

                   EDL  = T [(Ekv  )(CUk  )+(Egv  )(CUg  )]  

The ground reflected illuminance Egv  is obtained from Egv = rExH /2, where r = ground reflectivity, and EkH  =  total sky and sun horizontal illuminance.

Example 3.5.1  Given a room as shown


Figure 3.5.2 The room configuration of example 3.5.1.

For 12:00 hour June, and 8:00 hour December, the exterior sky and sun illuminance (lux) for Bangkok are given as follows:

Table 3.5.1 the exterior sky and sun illuminance (lux) for Bangkok

 
Sun horizontal

Sky horizontal,Ekh

Sky vertical,Ekv

12:00 hr. June
20,000
46630
23315
08:00 hr. December
10,000
9392
4696

The window is unshaded.  The glass transmittance is 0.8, and the ground reflectivity around the exterior is 0.2.  Assume the surrounding area is clean.

Given Hw   = 1.0 m. and Ww   = 4 m., the daylight illuminance at 10%, 30%, etc. of the room depth from the window can be calculated as in the followings.

Step 1
                   Te    =   (0.8)(1.0)(0.9)
                           =   0.72

Step 2  The exterior illuminance are already given,

 
Ekv  /(Ekh /2)
12:00 hr. June 1.0
08:00 hr. December 1.0

W/Hw   =   4/1  =   4
D  /Hw     =   4/1  =   4

Step 3  From the table, the following are obtained.

Table 3.5.2

P  (%)
CUk
CUg

10

0.563

0.183

30

0.247

0.159

50

0.126

0.103

70

0.083

0.071

90

0.070

0.060

Step 4 
For              Evg  =   (r)EkH  /2

                           =   (0.2)(2Ekh  +Es  )/2, where

                   Es    =   horizontal illuminance from sun.

The following table and graph show the results from the calculation.

Table 3.5.3 Resultant illuminance from the Lumen method.

% from window

E kh (CUk )

E kv (CUg )

E DL

 

12:00
June

08:00
December

12:00
June

08:00
December

12:00
June

08:00
December

10

13126

2644

1219

355

10328

2159

30

5159

1160

1059

308

4477

1057

50

2938

592

686

200

2616

570

70

1935

389

473

138

1734

379

90

1632

329

400

116

1463

320


Figure 3.5.3 The resultant illuminance values from the Lumen method.

 

Table 3.5.4 Reflectances of building materials and outside surfaces.

Material

Reflectance (%)

Material

Reflectance (%)

Bluestone, sandstone

18

Asphalt (free from dirt)

7

Brick

Earth (moist ultivated)

7

light buff

48

Granolite pavament

17

dark buff

40

Grass (dark green)

6

dark red glazed

30

Gravel

13

Cement

27

Macadam

18

Concrete

55

Slate (dark clay)

8

Granite

40

Marble (white)

45

Snow

Paint (white)

new

74

New

75

old

64

Old

55

Vegetation (mean)

25

Table 3.5.5 Typical light loss factors for daylighting design

Location

Light loss factor glazing position

 

Vertical

Sloped

Horizontal

Clean areas

0.9

0.8

0.7

Industrial areas

0.8

0.7

0.6

Very dirty areas

0.7

0.6

0.5

Source: IES RP-23-1989; reprinted with permission.


Table 3.5.6 Coefficient of utilization from window without blinds; sky component     Exvk  /Ekhk  =1.0.

Depth (%)

Window width/Window height

5

1

2

3

4

6

8

Infinite

1

10

.671

.704

.711

.715

.717

.726

.726

.728
 

30

.458

.595

.654

.668

.672

.682

.683

.685

 

50

.313

.462

.563

.589

.598

.607

.608

.610

 

70

.227

.362

.478

.515

.527

.530

.532

.534

 

90

.186

.306

.424

.465

.481

.468

.471

.472

2

10

.545

.636

.658

.660

.661

.665

.666

.672

 

30

.239

.367

.459

.484

.491

.499

.501

.506

 

50

.121

.203

.286

.320

.335

.348

.351

.355

 

70

.074

.128

.192

.226

.243

.259

.264

.267

 

90

.058

.101

.156

.188

.207

.215

.221

.223

3

10

.431

.561

.607

.613

.614

.616

.615

.631

 

30

.133

.223

.306

.337

.348

.357

.357

.366

 

50

.058

.103

.155

.183

.197

.211

.213

.218

 

70

.037

.064

.098

.119

.132

.147

.150

.154

 

90

.030

.051

.079

.098

.110

.122

.126

.129

4

10

.339

.482

.549

.560

.563

.566

.565

.593

 

30

.078

.139

.204

.234

.247

.258

.260

.272

 

50

.033

.060

.094

.114

.126

.139

.143

.150

 

70

.022

.039

.061

.074

.083

.095

.099

.104

 

90

.019

.032

.050

.061

.070

.080

.084

.089

6

10

.211

.343

.433

.453

.458

.461

.461

.518

 

30

.033

.065

.103

.123

.135

.145

.148

.167

 

50

.015

.029

.047

.057

.064

.073

.077

.086

 

70

.011

.021

.033

.040

.045

.051

.054

.060

 

90

.010

.019

.028

.034

.038

.044

.046

.052

Table 3.5.6 (Continued)

Depth( %)

Window width/Window height

5

1

2

3

4

6

8

Infinite

8

10

.135

.238

.326

.353

.362

.366

.367

.452

 

30

.016

.034

.058

.072

.080

.090

.094

.116

 

50

.008

.017

.027

.034

.039

.045

.048

.059

 

70

.006

.013

.021

.026

.028

.032

.035

.043

 

90

.005

.012

.019

.023

.025

.029

.031

.038

10

10

.090

.165

.244

.272

.283

.290

.291

.395

 

30

.009

.020

.036

.045

.052

.060

.064

.087

 

50

.005

.010

.019

.023

.026

.030

.033

.044

 

70

004

.009

.015

.018

.020

.023

.025

.033

 

90

.003

.008

.014

.016

.018

.020

.022

.030

Source: IES RP-23-1989' reprinted with permission.

Table 3.5.7    Coefficient of utilization from window without blinds; Ground component.

Depth (%)

Window width/Window height

5

1

2

3

4

6

8

Infinite

1

10

.105

.137

.177

.197

.207

.208

.210

.211

 

30

.116

.157

.203

.225

.235

.241

.243

.244

 

50

.110

.165

.217

.241

.252

.267

.269

.270

 

70

.101

.162

.217

.243

.253

.283

.285

.286

 

90

.091

.146

.199

.230

.239

.290

.292

.293

2

10

.095

.124

.160

.178

.186

.186

.189

.191

 

30

.082

.132

.179

.201

.212

.219

.222

.225

 

50

.062

.113

.165

.189

.202

.214

.218

.220

 

70

.051

.093

.141

.165

.179

.194

.198

.200

 

90

.045

.079

.118

.140

.153

.179

.183

.185

3

10

.088

.120

.157

.175

.183

.185

.163

.167

 

30

.059

.107

.154

.176

.187

.198

.193

.198

 

50

.039

.074

.114

.134

.146

.157

.163

.170

 

70

.031

.055

.085

.101

.111

.122

.127

.130

 

90

.028

.047

.070

.083

.092

.107

.113

.115

4

10

.073

.113

.154

.174

.183

.187

.176

.184

 

30

.040

.082

.127

.148

.159

.170

.177

.185

 

50

.025

.049

.078

.094

.103

.113

.117

.123

 

70

.020

.036

.054

.065

.071

.079

.083

.087

 

90

.019

.032

.046

.054

.060

.069

.073

.076

6

10

.056

.106

.143

.164

.175

.184

.173

.194

 

30

.021

.050

.081

.098

.107

.117

.123

.138

 

50

.013

.027

.041

.049

.054

.060

.064

.072

 

70

.011

.021

.029

.033

.035

.039

.041

.046

 

90

.011

.020

.026

.030

.032

.035

.037

.042

8

10

.036

.082

.122

.143

.156

.166

.170

.208

 

30

.011

.029

.050

.062

.070

.078

.082

.101

 

50

.007

.016

.024

.028

.031

.035

.038

.046

 

70

.006

.013

.018

.020

.021

.023

.025

.030

 

90

.006

.013

.017

.019

.020

.022

.023

.028

10

10

.024

.061

.109

.120

.131

.144

.147

.200

 

30

.006

.017

.034

.040

.046

.053

.056

.076

 

50

.004

.010

.016

.018

.020

.023

.024

.033

 

70

.004

.009

.013

.014

.015

.016

.016

.022

 

90

.004

.009

.013

.013

.014

.015

.016

.021

Source: IES RP-23-1989' reprinted with permission.