The IES method for daylight
calculation is consistent with the Lumen method for uniform
electric lighting calculation.
It treats the window as if it is a side luminaire,
and uses “light loss factor” and coefficients of utilization”
to arrive at the required illuminance value. Required daylight information includes
exterior horizontal and vertical illuminance.
The method has been developed
from the same methodology described earlier, which uses
numerical integration of equations (3.4.5), (3.4.11), (3.4.12)
and (3.4.13).
Consistent with tabulation based
methods, there are assumptions on room configuration, the
work plane, and the sky luminance distribution.
The Lumen method adopts 5 sky
luminance distribution models.
3.5.1 Assumptions and Characteristics
of the Method
The sky distribution models are given
in Table 3.3.6
a) The method applies
to rectangular-shaped room with uniformly distributed windows.
If the room has irregular shape, prudent judgment
must be used.
b) The method does not accommodate
direct sunlight. The
effects of shading devices can be accommodated through accounting
for view factor of the window to the sky.
c) Provisions are
allowed for different glazing type and vertical and horizontal
blinds.
d) The following figure
illustrates the configuration for the application of the
method.

Figure3.5.1 Configuration of the room in the Lumen method.
- The ceiling reflectance is assumed 70%. The ceiling surface extends from the part
of the wall above the window.
- The wall reflectance is assumed 50%. The wall surface extends from the window
sill to the top of the window.
- The floor reflectance is assumed 30%. The floor surface extends from the floor
to the window sill.
- The workplane is 0.75 m. from the floor. The window sill is at the workplane.
If the
window sill height is within 0.30 m. (1 foot) from the workplane,
no adjustment is necessary, if the window sill is below
the workplane, say, extends down to the floor, then the
light contribution from the part of the window below the
sill is discounted.
But if it is required superposition method can be
used to assess the contribution of the additional light
contribution. If
the sill is too far above the workplane, then there is an
unavoidable error in using the method.
The method gives
illumination values for 5 points on the workplane, at 10,
30, 50, 70 and 90% of room depth, measured from the window.
3.5.2 Calculation
Procedure
Let Ekv and Ekh
be the illuminance values on an exterior vertical
plane, and an exterior horizontal plane respectively.
Step
1 Determine the effective light transmittance
through the window, Te
Let
Te = (Tw )(Vf )(LLF
)
where: Tw =
transmittivity of the window glazing, see sample values
in table.
Vf = effective view factor of interior of window frame to the sky, accounting
for shading devices, and blinds
LLF = light loss factor accounting mainly for loss in
visibility and light to surrounding,
see recommended values in table.
Step 2
Determine the exterior horizontal illuminance Ekh
and vertical illuminance Ekv
to be used for the calculation.
Step
3 Determine
the coefficient of utilization: sky component CUk
, and the coefficient of utilization: ground component
CUg from tables.
For
CUk , the values are tabulated with
the following parameters;
- the ratio of Ekv /(Ekh
/2)
- Ww (window
width)/Hw (window height)
- D (room depth)/Hw
(window height)
For CUg , the values are
given for (D /Hw ) and (Ww
/Hw ) ratios.
Step
4 Calculate
the interior illuminance at the workplane, at each of the
5 points, by the relationship
The
ground reflected illuminance Egv
is obtained from Egv = rExH /2, where
r
= ground reflectivity, and EkH
=
total sky and sun horizontal illuminance.
Example
3.5.1 Given a room as shown

Figure 3.5.2 The room configuration of example
3.5.1.
For 12:00
hour June, and 8:00 hour December, the exterior sky and
sun illuminance (lux) for Bangkok are given as follows:
Table
3.5.1 the exterior sky and sun illuminance (lux) for Bangkok
| |
Sun horizontal |
Sky
horizontal,Ekh |
Sky
vertical,Ekv |
| 12:00 hr. June |
20,000 |
46630 |
23315 |
| 08:00 hr. December |
10,000 |
9392 |
4696 |
The window is unshaded. The glass transmittance is 0.8, and the
ground reflectivity around the exterior is 0.2. Assume the surrounding area is clean.
Given Hw
= 1.0 m. and Ww =
4 m., the daylight illuminance at 10%, 30%, etc. of the
room depth from the window can be calculated as in the followings.
Step 1
Te = (0.8)(1.0)(0.9)
= 0.72
Step
2 The exterior illuminance are already given,
| |
Ekv /(Ekh /2)
|
| 12:00 hr. June |
1.0 |
| 08:00 hr. December |
1.0 |
Ww
/Hw =
4/1 =
4
D /Hw =
4/1 =
4
Step
3 From the table, the following are obtained.
Table
3.5.2
| P (%) |
CUk |
CUg |
10 |
0.563 |
0.183 |
30 |
0.247 |
0.159 |
50 |
0.126 |
0.103 |
70 |
0.083 |
0.071 |
90 |
0.070 |
0.060 |
Step 4
For
Evg =
(r)EkH
/2
= (0.2)(2Ekh +Es
)/2, where
Es = horizontal illuminance from sun.
The following
table and graph show the results from the calculation.
Table
3.5.3 Resultant illuminance from the Lumen method.
| %
from window |
E
kh (CUk ) |
E
kv (CUg ) |
E
DL |
| |
12:00
June |
08:00
December |
12:00
June |
08:00
December |
12:00
June |
08:00
December |
10 |
13126 |
2644 |
1219 |
355 |
10328 |
2159 |
30 |
5159 |
1160 |
1059 |
308 |
4477 |
1057 |
50 |
2938 |
592 |
686 |
200 |
2616 |
570 |
70 |
1935 |
389 |
473 |
138 |
1734 |
379 |
90 |
1632 |
329 |
400 |
116 |
1463 |
320 |

Figure 3.5.3 The resultant illuminance values from the
Lumen method.
Table
3.5.4 Reflectances of building materials and outside
surfaces.
Material |
Reflectance (%) |
Material |
Reflectance
(%) |
Bluestone, sandstone |
18 |
Asphalt (free from dirt) |
7 |
Brick |
|
Earth (moist ultivated) |
7 |
light buff |
48 |
Granolite pavament |
17 |
dark buff |
40 |
Grass (dark green) |
6 |
dark red glazed |
30 |
Gravel |
13 |
Cement |
27 |
Macadam |
18 |
Concrete |
55 |
Slate (dark clay) |
8 |
Granite |
40 |
|
|
Marble (white) |
45 |
Snow |
|
Paint (white) |
|
new |
74 |
New |
75 |
old |
64 |
Old |
55 |
Vegetation (mean) |
25 |
Table
3.5.5 Typical light loss factors for daylighting design
Location |
Light
loss factor glazing position |
| |
Vertical |
Sloped |
Horizontal |
Clean areas |
0.9 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
Industrial areas |
0.8 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
Very dirty areas |
0.7 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
Source:
IES RP-23-1989; reprinted with permission. |
Table 3.5.6 Coefficient of utilization
from window without blinds; sky component Exvk
/Ekhk =1.0.

|
Depth (%)
|
Window
width/Window height |
5
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
Infinite
|
1 |
10 |
.671 |
.704 |
.711 |
.715 |
.717 |
.726 |
.726 |
.728 |
| |
30 |
.458 |
.595 |
.654 |
.668 |
.672 |
.682 |
.683 |
.685 |
| |
50 |
.313 |
.462 |
.563 |
.589 |
.598 |
.607 |
.608 |
.610 |
| |
70 |
.227 |
.362 |
.478 |
.515 |
.527 |
.530 |
.532 |
.534 |
| |
90 |
.186 |
.306 |
.424 |
.465 |
.481 |
.468 |
.471 |
.472 |
2 |
10 |
.545 |
.636 |
.658 |
.660 |
.661 |
.665 |
.666 |
.672 |
| |
30 |
.239 |
.367 |
.459 |
.484 |
.491 |
.499 |
.501 |
.506 |
| |
50 |
.121 |
.203 |
.286 |
.320 |
.335 |
.348 |
.351 |
.355 |
| |
70 |
.074 |
.128 |
.192 |
.226 |
.243 |
.259 |
.264 |
.267 |
| |
90 |
.058 |
.101 |
.156 |
.188 |
.207 |
.215 |
.221 |
.223 |
3 |
10 |
.431 |
.561 |
.607 |
.613 |
.614 |
.616 |
.615 |
.631 |
| |
30 |
.133 |
.223 |
.306 |
.337 |
.348 |
.357 |
.357 |
.366 |
| |
50 |
.058 |
.103 |
.155 |
.183 |
.197 |
.211 |
.213 |
.218 |
| |
70 |
.037 |
.064 |
.098 |
.119 |
.132 |
.147 |
.150 |
.154 |
| |
90 |
.030 |
.051 |
.079 |
.098 |
.110 |
.122 |
.126 |
.129 |
4 |
10 |
.339 |
.482 |
.549 |
.560 |
.563 |
.566 |
.565 |
.593 |
| |
30 |
.078 |
.139 |
.204 |
.234 |
.247 |
.258 |
.260 |
.272 |
| |
50 |
.033 |
.060 |
.094 |
.114 |
.126 |
.139 |
.143 |
.150 |
| |
70 |
.022 |
.039 |
.061 |
.074 |
.083 |
.095 |
.099 |
.104 |
| |
90 |
.019 |
.032 |
.050 |
.061 |
.070 |
.080 |
.084 |
.089 |
6 |
10 |
.211 |
.343 |
.433 |
.453 |
.458 |
.461 |
.461 |
.518 |
| |
30 |
.033 |
.065 |
.103 |
.123 |
.135 |
.145 |
.148 |
.167 |
| |
50 |
.015 |
.029 |
.047 |
.057 |
.064 |
.073 |
.077 |
.086 |
| |
70 |
.011 |
.021 |
.033 |
.040 |
.045 |
.051 |
.054 |
.060 |
| |
90 |
.010 |
.019 |
.028 |
.034 |
.038 |
.044 |
.046 |
.052 |
Table
3.5.6 (Continued)

|
Depth(
%) |
Window
width/Window height |
5
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
Infinite
|
8 |
10 |
.135 |
.238 |
.326 |
.353 |
.362 |
.366 |
.367 |
.452 |
| |
30 |
.016 |
.034 |
.058 |
.072 |
.080 |
.090 |
.094 |
.116 |
| |
50 |
.008 |
.017 |
.027 |
.034 |
.039 |
.045 |
.048 |
.059 |
| |
70 |
.006 |
.013 |
.021 |
.026 |
.028 |
.032 |
.035 |
.043 |
| |
90 |
.005 |
.012 |
.019 |
.023 |
.025 |
.029 |
.031 |
.038 |
10 |
10 |
.090 |
.165 |
.244 |
.272 |
.283 |
.290 |
.291 |
.395 |
| |
30 |
.009 |
.020 |
.036 |
.045 |
.052 |
.060 |
.064 |
.087 |
| |
50 |
.005 |
.010 |
.019 |
.023 |
.026 |
.030 |
.033 |
.044 |
| |
70 |
004 |
.009 |
.015 |
.018 |
.020 |
.023 |
.025 |
.033 |
| |
90 |
.003 |
.008 |
.014 |
.016 |
.018 |
.020 |
.022 |
.030 |
Source: IES RP-23-1989' reprinted
with permission.
Table
3.5.7
Coefficient of utilization from window without blinds;
Ground component.

|
Depth (%) |
Window
width/Window height |
5
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
Infinite
|
1 |
10 |
.105 |
.137 |
.177 |
.197 |
.207 |
.208 |
.210 |
.211 |
| |
30 |
.116 |
.157 |
.203 |
.225 |
.235 |
.241 |
.243 |
.244 |
| |
50 |
.110 |
.165 |
.217 |
.241 |
.252 |
.267 |
.269 |
.270 |
| |
70 |
.101 |
.162 |
.217 |
.243 |
.253 |
.283 |
.285 |
.286 |
| |
90 |
.091 |
.146 |
.199 |
.230 |
.239 |
.290 |
.292 |
.293 |
2 |
10 |
.095 |
.124 |
.160 |
.178 |
.186 |
.186 |
.189 |
.191 |
| |
30 |
.082 |
.132 |
.179 |
.201 |
.212 |
.219 |
.222 |
.225 |
| |
50 |
.062 |
.113 |
.165 |
.189 |
.202 |
.214 |
.218 |
.220 |
| |
70 |
.051 |
.093 |
.141 |
.165 |
.179 |
.194 |
.198 |
.200 |
| |
90 |
.045 |
.079 |
.118 |
.140 |
.153 |
.179 |
.183 |
.185 |
3 |
10 |
.088 |
.120 |
.157 |
.175 |
.183 |
.185 |
.163 |
.167 |
| |
30 |
.059 |
.107 |
.154 |
.176 |
.187 |
.198 |
.193 |
.198 |
| |
50 |
.039 |
.074 |
.114 |
.134 |
.146 |
.157 |
.163 |
.170 |
| |
70 |
.031 |
.055 |
.085 |
.101 |
.111 |
.122 |
.127 |
.130 |
| |
90 |
.028 |
.047 |
.070 |
.083 |
.092 |
.107 |
.113 |
.115 |
4 |
10 |
.073 |
.113 |
.154 |
.174 |
.183 |
.187 |
.176 |
.184 |
| |
30 |
.040 |
.082 |
.127 |
.148 |
.159 |
.170 |
.177 |
.185 |
| |
50 |
.025 |
.049 |
.078 |
.094 |
.103 |
.113 |
.117 |
.123 |
| |
70 |
.020 |
.036 |
.054 |
.065 |
.071 |
.079 |
.083 |
.087 |
| |
90 |
.019 |
.032 |
.046 |
.054 |
.060 |
.069 |
.073 |
.076 |
6 |
10 |
.056 |
.106 |
.143 |
.164 |
.175 |
.184 |
.173 |
.194 |
| |
30 |
.021 |
.050 |
.081 |
.098 |
.107 |
.117 |
.123 |
.138 |
| |
50 |
.013 |
.027 |
.041 |
.049 |
.054 |
.060 |
.064 |
.072 |
| |
70 |
.011 |
.021 |
.029 |
.033 |
.035 |
.039 |
.041 |
.046 |
| |
90 |
.011 |
.020 |
.026 |
.030 |
.032 |
.035 |
.037 |
.042 |
8 |
10 |
.036 |
.082 |
.122 |
.143 |
.156 |
.166 |
.170 |
.208 |
| |
30 |
.011 |
.029 |
.050 |
.062 |
.070 |
.078 |
.082 |
.101 |
| |
50 |
.007 |
.016 |
.024 |
.028 |
.031 |
.035 |
.038 |
.046 |
| |
70 |
.006 |
.013 |
.018 |
.020 |
.021 |
.023 |
.025 |
.030 |
| |
90 |
.006 |
.013 |
.017 |
.019 |
.020 |
.022 |
.023 |
.028 |
10 |
10 |
.024 |
.061 |
.109 |
.120 |
.131 |
.144 |
.147 |
.200 |
| |
30 |
.006 |
.017 |
.034 |
.040 |
.046 |
.053 |
.056 |
.076 |
| |
50 |
.004 |
.010 |
.016 |
.018 |
.020 |
.023 |
.024 |
.033 |
| |
70 |
.004 |
.009 |
.013 |
.014 |
.015 |
.016 |
.016 |
.022 |
| |
90 |
.004 |
.009 |
.013 |
.013 |
.014 |
.015 |
.016 |
.021 |
Source:
IES RP-23-1989' reprinted with permission.